St.
George’s, Grenada, March 5th, 2010:
Members of Her Majesty’s Opposition
are calling on the Government of
Grenada to conduct an urgent review
of the school books programme so as
to reduce the pain it is causing to
the poor and vulnerable and to
ensure it does not deny any child
the right to an education according
to the Convention on the Rights of
the Child which was signed and
ratified by the Government of
Grenada.
According to members of the
opposition an increasing number of
parents are expressing concerns to
them about the experiences they are
having with the programme. Apart
from the fact that parents who have
more than three children in school
are finding it difficult to meet the
payment of one hundred dollars or
more, some are being denied the
opportunity to make part payments as
they can afford. According to
Opposition member, Hon. Roland Bhola
the Parliamentary Representative for
St. Andrew North East, in some cases
parents who go out of their way to
make a part payment are told that is
not how the programme operates and
their monies are refused, leaving
their children without the necessary
text books.
In some
constituencies, there are cases of
students suspended from school
because their parents are unable to
afford the full payment. Bhola
explained that some students who
accidentally damage the books are
denied new ones even if they are
genuinely unable to pay. He noted
that these drastic measures can only
impact negatively on our children’s
education. He said it pained him
when he encountered a situation in
which a seven year old was denied
new books because the old ones got
wet in a sudden downpour of rain as
she was journeying home from
school. He said even when the
parent offered to pay for the
damaged books in installments; she
was not given the new books.
Meanwhile, many students are left
without the required text books
despite the fact that they have paid
for them in advance. Many of these
parents are not reimbursed their
monies even if the child never
received the books. The Opposition
believes that for a Government which
boasts of the School Books Programme
as one of its biggest achievement,
every effort should be made to
eliminate these problems.
The
opposition says it is convinced that
the previous programme was far more
effective when needy secondary
school students paid $75 dollars and
received all their books in a rental
scheme, and free books were provided
for needy primary school students.
While the opposition has no problem
with the principle of free school
books for all children, it is of the
belief that this should not be at
the expense of the poor and
vulnerable and certainly not at a
time when financial resources are
very limited.