New National Party discussion forum



[ New National Party discussion forum ] [ FAQ ]

[Previous Message] [Next Message]

Date: November 23, 2016 at 23:27:53
From: News, []


ST. GEORGE’S, GRENADA, November 23, 2016 – GIS: In the Referendum case, in which an injunction was sought to stop the Supervisor of Elections from going ahead with the
Referendum tomorrow, the applicant was represented by a powerful battery of lawyers.

The lead lawyer for the Claimant was Mr. James Bristol, who from time to time acts as a High Court Judge. With him in this case was Ms. Claudette Joseph, who has served as
the Registrar of the Court.

A key argument advanced for the Claimant by her lead lawyer Mr. Bristol was that a certain FORM in the Referendum Regulations requires that the actual date of the Referendum
be on the referendum ballot paper, or else the Referendum be invalid.

That argument, said Dr Francis Alexis QC for the Supervisor of Elections, was a complete misreading by Mr Bristol of what is a very simple FORM. Dr Alexis took the court
through a detailed and methodical examination of the Form to show that the Form has three distinct components, namely, the Ballot Paper, the Counterfoil to the Ballot Paper,
and the Stub to which the Ballot Paper is attached.

The date which Mr. Bristol was referring to, Alexis pointed out, is not on the Ballot Paper, the Ballot Paper being clearly defined by the law as being the sheet of paper on
which a voter votes to approve or not approve a constitutional amendment Bill.

Instead, the date is on the Stub to which the Ballot Paper is attached, and that Stub is not visible to any voter. Therefore, Dr. Alexis reasoned, there is absolutely no
merit whatsoever in the submission by Mr. Bristol that a date has to be on the Ballot Paper.

On Dr Alexis thus taking the court through that FORM, Mr. Bristol at once told the presiding Judge, the Hon Madame Justice Wynante Roberts that, given that explanation, he
Mr. Bristol was abandoning the claim that the Referendum date has to be on the Ballot Paper. Mr. Bristol accordingly withdrew that argument of his.

From Chairman of Constitution Reform Advisory Committee,Dr. Francis Alexis.

Government Information Service

[Previous Message] [Next Message]

By posting your message, you agree to indemnify the owners, employees, agents and representatives of the website and to hold them harmless from any and all claims and liabilities (including attorneys fees) resulting from any material posted to the NNP Discussion forum, or from any acts resulting from participants' use of this forum. We reserve the right to remove any messages posted containing nudity, obscenities, threatening, abusive, libelous or defamatory material. also reserves the right to reveal your identity (or whatever information we know about you) in the event of a troll,complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you. Please try to keep the forum discussions clean as possible.

Follow Ups:

[ New National Party discussion forum ] [ FAQ ]

TalkShop 2.77 BETA